Compare
Kling vs Wan
Wan 3.0 includes text, image, and reference video. Kling 3.0 is image-to-video, and Kling Motion uses a motion clip. Wan also has still-image engines. These figures are catalog defaults for one output. They are not a quality ranking.
Kling video
| Engine | Type | Catalog hint | Duration | Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kling 3.0 I2V | i2v | 3–15s · optional soundtrack | 3–15s | 77 |
| Kling 2.6 Pro Motion | motion | Character image + motion video | Infinity–-Infinitys | 30.80 |
| Kling 3 Motion | motion | Character image + motion video | Infinity–-Infinitys | 44 |
| Kling 2.6 Motion | motion | Character image + motion video | Infinity–-Infinitys | 19.80 |
Wan video
| Engine | Type | Catalog hint | Duration | Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wan 3.0 T2V | t2v | Text → video · 2–30s | 2–30s | 49.50 |
| Wan 3.0 I2V | i2v | Image → video · 2–30s | 2–30s | 49.50 |
| Wan 3.0 Ref2V | r2v | 1–10 identity refs · optional audio | 2–30s | 49.50 |
Questions
How long is one clip?
Wan 3.0 text-to-video is listed at 2–30 seconds. A multi-step flow can continue from the last frame toward about 5 minutes, which is the limit already stated on the UmZobo homepage.
Which one is better?
These figures are catalog defaults for one output. They are not a quality ranking.